12 Comments
author

Thanks Tom!

Expand full comment

Thanks for the heads-up Horrible idea that must be stopped!

Expand full comment

this is exactly what is happening. The extent of the corruption is amazing.

Expand full comment

Your take is exactly correct, Ed!

Expand full comment

Consensus science has a well-documented history of being way wrong and abusing those who dared to challenge it & the consensus is wrong about GHE & CAGW.

1. Earth is cooler w the atmos/WV/30% albedo not warmer.

YouTube: Greenhouse Effect Theory Goes Kerbluey

2. Ubiquitous GHE heat balance graphics use bad math and badder physics.

YouTube: Atmospheric Heat Balances That Don't

3. Kinetic heat transfer modes of contiguous atmos molecules render a BB surface model impossible.

Search: “Bruges group kerbluey”

GHE & CAGW climate “science” are indefensible rubbish so alarmists must resort to fear mongering, lies, lawsuits, censorship and violence.

Expand full comment

Those chains for floating wind farms must be bigger even than chains for anchoring ships? Not sure what '7 to 1 scope' means, but the thought of those chains scraping along the sea bottom sounds like terrible environment destruction indeed, not to mention the cost and the eyesore. BTW, the deep ocean off the west coast is why we don't have wind farms (yet) off CA, OR, and WA.

Expand full comment

“and will be just one in an array of 10 such turbines that would together produce up to 144 megawatts of clean energy.”

There isn’t a chance in hell these things will ever even scratch the surface on producing 144MW. More nameplate rating deception like I see for many other “green” energy companies…

Expand full comment