Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris Bond's avatar

"create ... 305 permanent operations jobs. (up to $360 million potential contract value)"

Over US$ 1 million per 'green' job.

Expand full comment
Matt Estes's avatar

A wonky clarification, perhaps too wonky but here it goes. FERC DOES HAVE JURISDICTION OVER DIRECT CURRENT ELECTRICITY. The Federal Power Act gives FERC jurisdiction over all interstate transmission of electricity, and it exercises jurisdiction over transmission on DC lines throughout the country. The reason that FERC does not have jurisdiction over the DC lines between Texas and the Eastern Interconnect is because FERC ordered those interconnections to be built pursuant to a section of the Federal Power Act that gives FERC the authority to order interconnections in certain circumstances. The interconnections were constructed as part of a special political deal that allowed the interconnections, which were needed for reliability purposes, to be constructed without subjecting Texas to FERC jurisdiction. I personally see no reason why use of that special statutory provision should make any difference, certainly nothing in it suggests that interconnections ordered pursuant to that section do not constitute transmission in interstate commerce, but there you have it.

In any event, the fact that the proposed new line is a DC line does not, alone, guarantee that Texas will remain outside of FERC jurisdiction. That will require another similar order from FERC

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts