Congress is Not Repealing The "Green New Scam" As President Trump Promised
If Congress thought they could sneak this in by calling it "The One, Big, Beautiful Bill," they are mistaken.
I recently posted an article titled “The Inflation Reduction Act is a Disastrous Policy That Must Be Repealed,” pointing out why the IRA is an economic and grid-destabilizing disaster. President Trump pledged to repeal the 2022 law during his election campaign, calling it the “Green New Scam,” and vowed to rescind all unspent funds under the legislation. He specifically targeted provisions like electric vehicle subsidies, offshore wind incentives, and EV mandates.
Since taking office on January 20, 2025, Trump has taken many steps toward his goals. On his first day in office, he signed an executive order, "Unleashing American Energy," which paused the disbursement of IRA funds, including those for clean energy projects and EV infrastructure. However, since the IRA was voted into law, a full repeal requires congressional action. Unfortunately, the Republican-controlled Congress does not intend to fulfill Trump’s promises.
Congress’s proposed budget reconciliation bill, titled “The One, Big, Beautiful Bill,” was released yesterday, May 13, 2025. Instead of repealing the IRA subsidies, the bill keeps most of them and starts phasing them out in four years. Of course, such a plan could easily be reversed by whoever is elected president in 2028 or by Congress itself.
In a Substack post yesterday, May 13, 2025, Alex Epstein did an excellent job analyzing the reconciliation bill's many flaws. His post is reprinted below.
Republicans ran on a pledge to “terminate” the trillion-dollar Inflation Reduction Act subsidies, aka “the Green New Scam.”
But their proposed budget keeps almost all the subsidies, while falsely claiming to save money through easily-reversed “phaseouts” starting in 4 years!
If you’re just joining the conversation about the IRA subsidies, here’s what you need to know: they are subsidies for inferior forms of energy that cost a fortune, raise energy costs, and make our grid unreliable—especially the solar/wind subsidies.
Why Congress's new budget should eliminate all IRA "tax credits"
The IRA subsidies should all be fully repealed.
It is possible that some sort of compromise is absolutely necessary to repeal most of the IRA.
However, the current proposal from House Ways and Means does not repeal the IRA subsidies in any meaningful way due to 3 fatal flaws.
Dealbreaker 1: Savings are based on “phaseouts,” not ending subsidies now
The overwhelming majority of the bill’s “savings” are based not on truly ending subsidies now, but on empty promises of “phaseouts” that start 4 years in the future and can easily be reversed by future Congresses.
Multiple tax credits, including the most expensive and destructive solar/wind ITC and PTC, aren’t being eliminated—only “phased out” starting 4 or more years from now.
Hence the overwhelming majority of the bill’s “savings” have no chance of happening in the near-term.Only 3% of PTC’s savings, 26% of ITC’s planned savings, 20% of 45Q’s savings, and 7% of 45U’s 10-year savings are projected to come between 2025-2029—the rest will come starting 2030, three Congresses from now and when Trump will be out of office!
The most important thing to know about a “phaseout” of subsidies is that, unlike the promised “termination” of subsidies, a “phaseout” is easily reversed by future Congresses under pressure by lobbyists.
The vast majority of the current bill’s “savings” are wishful thinking.After the phony “phaseout” period is complete, subsidies don’t even truly end—it’s only subsidies for new projects that end.
Projects that come online by 2031 are grandfathered in and can keep collecting “production” subsidies for up to 10 more years!Myth: A lot of the solar and wind subsidies won’t happen because of strict anti-China provisions.
Truth: The same solar/wind lobbyists who successfully lobbied for a subsidy bonanza under this bill have accepted these provisions because they know they’re gameable.Anti-China requirements
1. Can be easily reversed
2. Can be very flexibly interpreted by agencies pressured by lobbyists
3. Can be avoided by rerouting/relabeling supply chains or investments—as anti-China provisions under the IRA already were.
Dealbreaker 2: “Phaseouts” don’t even start until after Trump’s term ends
There isn’t even a promise to start phasing out the most damaging IRA subsidies, those for solar and wind, until after Trump is President!
For the next 4 years government will keep giving grid-destroying 10-year subsidies for new solar and wind projects!The most important responsibility for Republicans regarding the IRA is to cut all existing and future subsidies for solar and wind, as these subsidies flood our grid with unreliable electricity.
The current proposal cuts no existing subsidies and keeps almost all futures ones.The one solar and wind subsidy cut is for home solar buyers, but this is phony—because it will just cause people to (even more inefficiently) lease systems that will still get subsidies under the ITC (whose "phaseout" starts in 2029 when Trump is gone!).
Dealbreaker 3: Two huge subsidies are kept
Two huge subsidies are kept, “clean fuels” (including biofuels, which is actually extended!) and carbon capture.
Both of these are huge giveaways for expensive CO2 reduction activities that can’t meaningfully scale.Myth: “The Ways and Means Republican tax bill ends special interest giveaways”
Truth: It either keeps the giveaways totally (carbon capture subsidies, biofuel subsidies) or makes an easily-reversible promise to phase them out in 4+ years.¹
Myth: “Repeals and phases out every green corporate welfare subsidy in the Democrats’ Inflation Act.”
Truth: Carbon capture and “clean fuel” subsidies (e.g., biofuels) are not repealed or phased out—and the “phased out” subsidies will easily be reversed by a future Congress.
An infinitely better compromise: End all subsidies now but grandfather in existing projects
If full IRA repeal is politically impossible, and compromise is necessary to help those with existing projects depending on IRA: end all subsidies now but grandfather existing projects (for as few subsidies as possible, don't do for grid-killing wind subsidies).
In a grandfathering scenario, only the following projects should be included:
- Projects with construction completed or significant construction started
- Projects that already made >10% of the project expenditures
- Projects that entered into legally binding agreements with suppliers or clients, where the termination of such agreements would result in them having to pay >10% of the project expenditures in penalties.
Projects at the permitting stage shouldn’t be accepted.
Grandfathering for projects should also only cover the elements of the projects that are currently in the process of being substantively worked upon, not all the elements announced as part of the projects.
If only existing projects are grandfathered in, it would reduce the cost of the IRA by 60% from the currently projected $1.09 trillion (Cato) to $620.6 billion.
And unlike phony future “phaseout” savings that will easily be reversed, this proposal’s immediate subsidy termination (with grandfathering) gives us a real chance of being done with the IRA “Green New Scam” for good.
My Take
President Trump will hopefully exercise his strong powers of persuasion to get Congress to rewrite the bill and repeal every aspect of the “Green New Scam” as he promised. The fact that they are not repealing it highlights why government giveaways are popular—they appear to be free money! Even ExxonMobil and Oxy have encouraged Trump to keep the IRA subsidies on carbon capture. Of course, government giveaways are not free. They are paid for with federal government debt that the Federal Reserve System monetizes by printing money, which caused the 21.4% inflation rate from 2021 through 2024.
This madness has got to stop, as President Trump promised. Congress must reverse course, rewrite this bill, and remove every aspect of the Green New Scam.
This is the one chance to get it done. It is now or never.
Thank you for reading “Thoughts about Energy and Economics.” This publication is reader-supported, so please “like” it, share it with friends and colleagues, and become a paid subscriber. Your support is greatly appreciated!
As with the Texas government I see the pressure from big business is just too great. Dangle a dime in front of politicians and they think they are getting something for it or at least it might keep their constitutions happy thinking they are getting economic development.
The common narrative now is that in order to get that development locals and the state have to forfeit their tax income to encourage that business to come their way.
Rarely in the wind, solar and battery development is there any full time employment of any merit after construction. So all we have is a transient group of low paid construction workers.
Just like the bill Senator Birdwell and I brought forward that passed the senate - SB 1754 removing tax abatements for wind, solar and batteries at a county level (CH 312) it will not get a hearing in the house. Not a lot of money about $175 Million per year, but money counties could use. It was pretty much a no brainer, but increased tax money for counties, same thing happening at the top level with the IRA.
This has to stop, the money has to stop flowing, and stop distorting the markets. There is much bigger picture than just energy here. The president ran on a promise - that promise needs to be kept for all the rural communities who voted for him.
Write your congressman now and make them tow the line of the campaign promise.